LSGGX : Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund Class Y

LSGGX is a Allocation Market Total World with MODERATE fees.

LSGGX

Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund Class Y

FI Score

32 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

3 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

3 /10

Different Funds

We found 9,682 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare LSGGX vs OSFCX

  • osfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Senior Floating Rate Plus Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LSGGX vs NYSAX

  • nysax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Nysa Fund

Expenses: 4.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSGGX vs PAMVX

  • pamvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Pacific Advisors Mid Cap Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 6.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSGGX vs OGYCX

  • ogycx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco High Yield Bond Factor Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LSGGX vs BXGCX

  • bxgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Barings Global High Yield Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LSGGX vs DCHF

  • dchf
  • ETF
  • Money Market
  • World

Citigroup ETNs linked to the VelocityShares Daily 4X Long USD vs. CHF Index

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a World Money Market fund. See why »

Compare LSGGX vs DXSTX

  • dxstx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Direxion Monthly 25+ Year Treasury Bear 1.35X Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare LSGGX vs RYPAX

  • rypax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Industrials

Rydex Transportation Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare LSGGX vs RYTSX

  • rytsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Industrials

Rydex Transportation Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare LSGGX vs UUPSX

  • uupsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProFunds UltraEmerging Markets Fund Service Class

Expenses: 2.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2024   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo