LSFYX : Loomis Sayles Senior Floating Rate and Fixed Income Fund Class Y

LSFYX is a Bond Market High Yield Bond with MODERATE fees.

LSFYX

Loomis Sayles Senior Floating Rate and Fixed Income Fund Class Y

FI Score

47 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

2 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare LSFYX vs HWIAX

18% FI Score
  • hwiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Hotchkis & Wiley Capital Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSFYX vs FFIOX

18% FI Score
  • ffiox
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

FormulaFolios US Equity Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 2.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFYX vs FLRTX

18% FI Score
  • flrtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Franklin LifeSmart™ 2030 Retirement Target Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSFYX vs FLYCX

18% FI Score
  • flycx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Nuveen Large Cap Select Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFYX vs GIRAX

18% FI Score
  • girax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Goldman Sachs International Real Estate Securities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare LSFYX vs DGMMX

18% FI Score
  • dgmmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

DGHM MicroCap Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFYX vs COGCX

18% FI Score
  • cogcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Columbia Select Global Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSFYX vs EBSCX

18% FI Score
  • ebscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

Equinox Campbell Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.87% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare LSFYX vs HEOAX

18% FI Score
  • heoax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Highland Long/Short Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 3.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare LSFYX vs ICEAX

18% FI Score
  • iceax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

ICON Energy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare LSFYX vs EVSEX

18% FI Score
  • evsex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Eaton Vance Special Equities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFYX vs KSMVX

18% FI Score
  • ksmvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Keeley Small-Mid Cap Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFYX vs FCSMX

18% FI Score
  • fcsmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Franklin International Small Cap Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFYX vs KMKNX

18% FI Score
  • kmknx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFYX vs AAPEX

18% FI Score
  • aapex
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Aberdeen Asia Pacific (ex-Japan) Equity Fund Institutional Service Class

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFYX vs GWSIX

18% FI Score
  • gwsix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Gabelli Focus Five Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFYX vs JOMEX

18% FI Score
  • jomex
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

JOHCM Emerging Markets Small Mid Cap Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.64% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFYX vs DCLVX

18% FI Score
  • dclvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Dunham Large Cap Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFYX vs ECCPX

18% FI Score
  • eccpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Multi-Cap Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFYX vs LTL

18% FI Score
  • ltl
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProShares Ultra Telecommunications

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo