LSFCX : Loomis Sayles Senior Floating Rate and Fixed Income Fund Class C

LSFCX is a Bond Market High Yield Bond with HIGH fees.

LSFCX

Loomis Sayles Senior Floating Rate and Fixed Income Fund Class C

FI Score

30 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare LSFCX vs HEWW

35% FI Score
  • heww
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Other Region

iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Mexico ETF

Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs HGHYX

35% FI Score
  • hghyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

The Hartford Healthcare Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs HMVSX

35% FI Score
  • hmvsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Hartford MidCap Value Fund Class R4

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs HRLSX

35% FI Score
  • hrlsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Hartford Global Real Asset Fund Class R4

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs PGWCX

35% FI Score
  • pgwcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

AllianzGI Focused Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs JDST

35% FI Score
  • jdst
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bear 2X Shares

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs JMCCX

35% FI Score
  • jmccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs KOL

35% FI Score
  • kol
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Other

VanEck Vectors Coal ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs LDMIX

35% FI Score
  • ldmix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Lazard Developing Markets Equity Portfolio Institutiona Shares

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs LMGAX

35% FI Score
  • lmgax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs XPP

35% FI Score
  • xpp
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs PNRAX

35% FI Score
  • pnrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Putnam Research Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs POGSX

35% FI Score
  • pogsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Pin Oak Equity Fund

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs PPEM

35% FI Score
  • ppem
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

PortfolioPlus Emerging Markets ETF

Expenses: 0.58% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs SSDAX

35% FI Score
  • ssdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

DWS Small Cap Growth Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs TLEH

35% FI Score
  • tleh
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

FlexShares Currency Hedged Morningstar EM Factor Tilt Index Fund

Expenses: 0.64% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs JJU

35% FI Score
  • jju
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

iPath Series B Bloomberg Aluminum Subindex Total Return ETN

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs RRRCX

35% FI Score
  • rrrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

DWS RREEF Real Estate Securities Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs RVVHX

35% FI Score
  • rvvhx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Royce Small-Cap Value Fund Investment Class

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs SBTAX

35% FI Score
  • sbtax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Salient Tactical Plus Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo