LSFCX : Loomis Sayles Senior Floating Rate and Fixed Income Fund Class C

LSFCX is a Bond Market High Yield Bond with HIGH fees.

LSFCX

Loomis Sayles Senior Floating Rate and Fixed Income Fund Class C

FI Score

30 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare LSFCX vs JPEU

49% FI Score
  • jpeu
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

JPMorgan Diversified Return Europe Equity ETF

Expenses: 0.37% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs NMFAX

49% FI Score
  • nmfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Nationwide Mellon Dynamic U.S. Core Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs NPFCX

49% FI Score
  • npfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

American Funds New Perspective Fund® Class C

Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs HFYSX

49% FI Score
  • hfysx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Hartford Schroders International Multi-Cap Value Fund Class R4

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs HDGRX

49% FI Score
  • hdgrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

The Hartford Dividend and Growth Fund Class R3

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs HLEMX

49% FI Score
  • hlemx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Harding Loevner Emerging Markets Portfolio Advisor Class

Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs JO

49% FI Score
  • jo
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Broad

iPath Series B Bloomberg Coffee Subindex Total Return ETN

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs OARDX

49% FI Score
  • oardx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Invesco Oppenheimer Rising Dividends Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs OFVIX

49% FI Score
  • ofvix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

O'Shaughnessy Market Leaders Value Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs OGBCX

49% FI Score
  • ogbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

JPMorgan Investor Balanced Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs OGINX

49% FI Score
  • oginx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Opportunities Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs PABAX

49% FI Score
  • pabax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Balanced Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs USCRX

49% FI Score
  • uscrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

USAA Cornerstone Moderately Aggressive Fund

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs OCGCX

49% FI Score
  • ocgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

JPMorgan Investor Conservative Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs MDLVX

49% FI Score
  • mdlvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Value Fund Investor A Shares

Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs MCDVX

49% FI Score
  • mcdvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

BlackRock Equity Dividend Fund Investor C Shares

Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs MSLVX

49% FI Score
  • mslvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Value Fund Service Shares

Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs ABRZX

49% FI Score
  • abrzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs ALVIX

49% FI Score
  • alvix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

American Century Large Company Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSFCX vs ASLAX

49% FI Score
  • aslax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

AB Select US Long/Short Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo