LSAGX : Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund Class A

LSAGX is a Allocation Market Total World with HIGH fees.

LSAGX

Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund Class A

FI Score

27 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

4 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

3 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

3 /10

Different Funds

We found 9,682 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare LSAGX vs LEND

25% FI Score
  • lend
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Amplify CrowdBureau(R) Peer-to-Peer Lending & Crowdfunding ETF

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare LSAGX vs GRES

25% FI Score
  • gres
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

IQ Global Resources ETF

Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare LSAGX vs LTUCX

25% FI Score
  • ltucx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LSAGX vs FUSGX

25% FI Score
  • fusgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Federated Fund for U.S. Government Securities Class A shares

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LSAGX vs GCINX

25% FI Score
  • gcinx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Green Century MSCI International Index Fund Individual Investor

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSAGX vs GIGAX

25% FI Score
  • gigax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Aberdeen International Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSAGX vs MCPCX

25% FI Score
  • mcpcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

BlackRock Asian Dragon Fund,Inc.Investor C Shares

Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSAGX vs HFHRX

25% FI Score
  • hfhrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hartford Floating Rate High Income Fund Class R3

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LSAGX vs JNVSX

25% FI Score
  • jnvsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Jensen Quality Value Fund Class J

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSAGX vs HLMOX

25% FI Score
  • hlmox
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSAGX vs MGBBX

25% FI Score
  • mgbbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

MFS Global Bond Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LSAGX vs MHNYX

25% FI Score
  • mhnyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Madison High Income Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LSAGX vs MNNCX

25% FI Score
  • mnncx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Victory Munder Multi-Cap Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSAGX vs MOATX

25% FI Score
  • moatx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Castle Focus Fund Class Investor

Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSAGX vs IEVIX

25% FI Score
  • ievix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Lazard International Equity Value Portfolio Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSAGX vs GPGAX

25% FI Score
  • gpgax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

BNY Mellon U.S. Mortgage Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LSAGX vs MEAIX

25% FI Score
  • meaix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Emerging Markets Fixed Income Opportunities Portfolio I

Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LSAGX vs MGOTX

25% FI Score
  • mgotx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Victory Munder Mid-Cap Core Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LSAGX vs MGHIX

25% FI Score
  • mghix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

MainStay Candriam Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LSAGX vs MHWIX

25% FI Score
  • mhwix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

BlackRock Strategic Global Bond Fund, Inc. Investor C Shares

Expenses: 1.64% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo