Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
2 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
2 /10
$LOGSX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 107 Sector Equity Healthcare funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- ieih
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Healthcare
iShares Evolved U.S. Innovative Healthcare ETF
Expenses: 0.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »
- prhsx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Healthcare
T. Rowe Price Health Sciences Fund
Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »
- fbiox
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Healthcare
Fidelity® Select Biotechnology Portfolio
Expenses: 0.72% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »
- xhs
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Healthcare
SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF
Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »
- fsmex
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Healthcare
Fidelity® Select Medical Technology and Devices Portfolio
Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »
- iehs
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Healthcare
iShares Evolved U.S. Healthcare Staples ETF
Expenses: 0.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »
- pjp
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Healthcare
Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF
Expenses: 0.56% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »
- btec
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Healthcare
Principal Healthcare Innovators Index ETF
Expenses: 0.42% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »
- jhmh
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Healthcare
John Hancock Multifactor Health Care ETF
Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »