LIT : Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF

LIT is a Sector Equity Market Basic Materials with MODERATE fees.

LIT

Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF

FI Score

47 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

3 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,815 Sector Equity Basic Materials funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare LIT vs SLGCX

13% FI Score
  • slgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth Portfolio Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs LCCTX

13% FI Score
  • lcctx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Leader Capital Leader Total Return Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs SIMUX

13% FI Score
  • simux
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

SIM U.S. Core Managed Volatility Fund Class Z Shares

Expenses: 2.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs WAMBX

13% FI Score
  • wambx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

WSTCM Credit Select Risk - Managed Fund Investor Shares

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs PLSCX

13% FI Score
  • plscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

DWS Multi-Asset Moderate Allocation Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs RSMAX

13% FI Score
  • rsmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

RBC Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs SIMZX

13% FI Score
  • simzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

SIM Income Fund Class Z Shares

Expenses: 2.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs TVECX

13% FI Score
  • tvecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Guggenheim RBP® Dividend Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs HIPS

13% FI Score
  • hips
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF

Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs LVPIX

13% FI Score
  • lvpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

ProFunds Large Cap Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs ABLCX

13% FI Score
  • ablcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

AllianzGI Retirement 2030 Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs ACVVX

13% FI Score
  • acvvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

AC Alternatives® Market Neutral Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 3.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs AEQAX

13% FI Score
  • aeqax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Ascendant Deep Value Bond Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 2.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs AFAAX

13% FI Score
  • afaax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Yorktown Capital Income Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs RYDKX

13% FI Score
  • rydkx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Rydex Dow Jones Industrial Average® Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs EDFCX

13% FI Score
  • edfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

AIG ESG Dividend Fund C Shares

Expenses: 1.87% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs DADGX

13% FI Score
  • dadgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Dunham Small Cap Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs MAVRX

13% FI Score
  • mavrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific Stock

Matthews Asia Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs LBHAX

13% FI Score
  • lbhax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

BrandywineGLOBAL - Global High Yield Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs AGFQX

13% FI Score
  • agfqx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

361 Global Managed Futures Strategy Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo