LIT : Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF

LIT is a Sector Equity Market Basic Materials with MODERATE fees.

LIT

Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF

FI Score

47 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

3 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,815 Sector Equity Basic Materials funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare LIT vs TCGAX

20% FI Score
  • tcgax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Timothy Plan Conservative Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs LGPIX

20% FI Score
  • lgpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

ProFunds Large Cap Growth Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs TYO

20% FI Score
  • tyo
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Direxion Daily 7-10 Year Treasury Bear 3X Shares

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs FTXNX

20% FI Score
  • ftxnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Growth Fund Investor Shares

Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs HCVCX

20% FI Score
  • hcvcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Hartford Conservative Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs HDPBX

20% FI Score
  • hdpbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Hodges Blue Chip Equity Income Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs USMCX

20% FI Score
  • usmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

AlphaSimplex Tactical U.S. Market Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs SOYB

20% FI Score
  • soyb
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

Teucrium Soybean

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs HRMDX

20% FI Score
  • hrmdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Heartland Mid Cap Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs FLRIX

20% FI Score
  • flrix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Franklin LifeSmart™ 2045 Retirement Target Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs SIHSX

20% FI Score
  • sihsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Guggenheim High Yield Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs VMOT

20% FI Score
  • vmot
  • ETF
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Alpha Architect Value Momentum Trend ETF

Expenses: 2.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs HSOAX

20% FI Score
  • hsoax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

HSBC Opportunity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs HSUAX

20% FI Score
  • hsuax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Rational Dynamic Brands Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs HTAAX

20% FI Score
  • htaax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Highland Total Return Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs FICAX

20% FI Score
  • ficax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Delaware Tax-Free California II Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs FGHNX

20% FI Score
  • fghnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Fidelity® Global High Income Fund

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs ICSBX

20% FI Score
  • icsbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Voya Short Term Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs IECAX

20% FI Score
  • iecax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Ivy Pictet Emerging Markets Local Currency Debt Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs WAVLX

20% FI Score
  • wavlx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Wavelength Interest Rate Neutral Fund

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo