LIT : Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF

LIT is a Sector Equity Market Basic Materials with MODERATE fees.

LIT

Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF

FI Score

47 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

3 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,815 Sector Equity Basic Materials funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare LIT vs TODCX

27% FI Score
  • todcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Touchstone Active Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.65% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs HAHAX

27% FI Score
  • hahax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hartford High Yield Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs HAHSX

27% FI Score
  • hahsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hartford High Yield Fund Class R4

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs NMCCX

27% FI Score
  • nmccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Voya MidCap Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs NMEDX

27% FI Score
  • nmedx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Northern Multi-Manager Emerging Markets Debt Opportunity Fund

Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs NRECX

27% FI Score
  • nrecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Neuberger Berman Real Estate Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs NWXEX

27% FI Score
  • nwxex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Nationwide Amundi Strategic Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs ODGIX

27% FI Score
  • odgix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

North Square Oak Ridge Disciplined Growth Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs MXXIX

27% FI Score
  • mxxix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Marsico 21st Century Fund

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs USBNX

27% FI Score
  • usbnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Fund Ordinary Class

Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs VICEX

27% FI Score
  • vicex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

USA Mutuals Vitium Global Fund Investor Class Shares

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs VAGIX

27% FI Score
  • vagix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Value Line Core Bond Fund

Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs VICAX

27% FI Score
  • vicax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

USA Mutuals Vitium Global Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs VVOCX

27% FI Score
  • vvocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Invesco Value Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs RDLCX

27% FI Score
  • rdlcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Columbia Disciplined Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs MSLLX

27% FI Score
  • msllx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Active International Allocation Portfolio Class L

Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs MAVFX

27% FI Score
  • mavfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Matrix Advisors Value Fund

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs MMCFX

27% FI Score
  • mmcfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

AMG Managers Emerging Opportunities Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs MIOBX

27% FI Score
  • miobx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

MFS Strategic Income Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIT vs NCMFX

27% FI Score
  • ncmfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Intermediate Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.73% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo