LIBCX : Columbia Total Return Bond Fund Class C

LIBCX is a Bond Market Total US Bond Market with HIGH fees.

LIBCX

Columbia Total Return Bond Fund Class C

FI Score

40 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond Total US Bond Market funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare LIBCX vs GAADX

30% FI Score
  • gaadx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Guinness Atkinson Asia Pacific Dividend Builder Fund

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIBCX vs GABVX

30% FI Score
  • gabvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Gabelli Value 25 Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIBCX vs RIMHX

30% FI Score
  • rimhx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

City National Rochdale Dividend & Income Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIBCX vs CFWAX

30% FI Score
  • cfwax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Industrials

Calvert Global Water Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare LIBCX vs IGTAX

30% FI Score
  • igtax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Transamerica Dynamic Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LIBCX vs WPCSX

30% FI Score
  • wpcsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

AB Concentrated Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIBCX vs GSACX

30% FI Score
  • gsacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Goldman Sachs China Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIBCX vs GLIAX

30% FI Score
  • gliax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

AllianzGI Retirement 2055 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LIBCX vs DTCCX

30% FI Score
  • dtccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

BNY Mellon Sustainable U.S. Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIBCX vs EVUDX

30% FI Score
  • evudx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Utilities

Wells Fargo Utility and Telecommunications Fund - Class Admin

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare LIBCX vs FSDCX

30% FI Score
  • fsdcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Fidelity® Select Communications Equip Portfolio

Expenses: 0.82% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare LIBCX vs FRMPX

30% FI Score
  • frmpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Nuveen Small Cap Growth Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIBCX vs IDIV

30% FI Score
  • idiv
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Metaurus U.S. Equity Cumulative Dividends Fund-Series 2027

Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIBCX vs JIVCX

30% FI Score
  • jivcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

JPMorgan Intrepid Value Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 1.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIBCX vs MVGCX

30% FI Score
  • mvgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LIBCX vs TBX

30% FI Score
  • tbx
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares Short 7-10 Year Treasury

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare LIBCX vs TBDAX

30% FI Score
  • tbdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth Fund-Class A

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIBCX vs CHIU

30% FI Score
  • chiu
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Global X MSCI China Utilities ETF

Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIBCX vs MTILX

30% FI Score
  • mtilx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Global Equity

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Infrastructure Portfolio Class L

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Global Equity Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LIBCX vs UVXY

30% FI Score
  • uvxy
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Volatility

ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF

Expenses: 1.65% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Volatility Alternative fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo