LIACX : Columbia Acorn Fund Class C

LIACX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Growth with HIGH fees.

LIACX

Columbia Acorn Fund Class C

FI Score

40 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

2 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

8 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

8 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,139 US Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare LIACX vs CHCAX

25% FI Score
  • chcax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Clough China Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIACX vs CIFCX

25% FI Score
  • cifcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Calvert Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIACX vs DFLCX

25% FI Score
  • dflcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

BNY Mellon Floating Rate Income Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIACX vs EBSPX

25% FI Score
  • ebspx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

Equinox Campbell Strategy Fund Class P

Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare LIACX vs FCNBX

25% FI Score
  • fcnbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Templeton International Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIACX vs LMSBX

25% FI Score
  • lmsbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Federated Municipal Bond Fund Class B Shares

Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIACX vs FHICX

25% FI Score
  • fhicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Federated High-Income Bond Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIACX vs FHK

25% FI Score
  • fhk
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

First Trust Hong Kong AlphaDEX Fund

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIACX vs LEND

25% FI Score
  • lend
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Amplify CrowdBureau(R) Peer-to-Peer Lending & Crowdfunding ETF

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare LIACX vs GRES

25% FI Score
  • gres
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

IQ Global Resources ETF

Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare LIACX vs LTUCX

25% FI Score
  • ltucx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIACX vs FUSGX

25% FI Score
  • fusgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Federated Fund for U.S. Government Securities Class A shares

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIACX vs LVAFX

25% FI Score
  • lvafx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LIACX vs GTAJX

25% FI Score
  • gtajx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Goldman Sachs Target Date 2030 Portfolio A Shares

Expenses: 0.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LIACX vs GCINX

25% FI Score
  • gcinx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Green Century MSCI International Index Fund Individual Investor

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIACX vs GIGAX

25% FI Score
  • gigax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Aberdeen International Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIACX vs MCPCX

25% FI Score
  • mcpcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

BlackRock Asian Dragon Fund,Inc.Investor C Shares

Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIACX vs HFHRX

25% FI Score
  • hfhrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hartford Floating Rate High Income Fund Class R3

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare LIACX vs HLMOX

25% FI Score
  • hlmox
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LIACX vs MGBBX

25% FI Score
  • mgbbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

MFS Global Bond Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo