Expense Ratio Rating
0 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
1 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
1 /10
$LEOIX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- ptrbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Putnam Fixed Income Absolute Return Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- shiax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Western Asset Short Duration High Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- phcix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Virtus Newfleet High Yield Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- iixix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Catalyst Insider Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- prvbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Permanent Portfolio Versatile Bond Portfolio Class I
Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mggyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Mirova Global Green Bond Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- echix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Eaton Vance High Income Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.67% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ahycx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Invesco High Yield Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- adpax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
AB Short Duration Portfolio Class A
Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »