LABCX : Loomis Sayles Strategic Alpha Fund Class C

LABCX is a Bond Market High Yield Bond with HIGH fees.

LABCX

Loomis Sayles Strategic Alpha Fund Class C

FI Score

30 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

2 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare LABCX vs HEWW

35% FI Score
  • heww
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Other Region

iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Mexico ETF

Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs HGHYX

35% FI Score
  • hghyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

The Hartford Healthcare Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs HMVSX

35% FI Score
  • hmvsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Hartford MidCap Value Fund Class R4

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs HRLSX

35% FI Score
  • hrlsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Hartford Global Real Asset Fund Class R4

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs PGWCX

35% FI Score
  • pgwcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

AllianzGI Focused Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs JDST

35% FI Score
  • jdst
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bear 2X Shares

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs JMCCX

35% FI Score
  • jmccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

JPMorgan Mid Cap Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs KOL

35% FI Score
  • kol
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Other

VanEck Vectors Coal ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Allocation fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs LDMIX

35% FI Score
  • ldmix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Lazard Developing Markets Equity Portfolio Institutiona Shares

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs LMGAX

35% FI Score
  • lmgax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs XPP

35% FI Score
  • xpp
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs PNRAX

35% FI Score
  • pnrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Putnam Research Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs POGSX

35% FI Score
  • pogsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Pin Oak Equity Fund

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs PPEM

35% FI Score
  • ppem
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

PortfolioPlus Emerging Markets ETF

Expenses: 0.58% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs SSDAX

35% FI Score
  • ssdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

DWS Small Cap Growth Fund - Class A

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs TLEH

35% FI Score
  • tleh
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

FlexShares Currency Hedged Morningstar EM Factor Tilt Index Fund

Expenses: 0.64% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs JJU

35% FI Score
  • jju
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

iPath Series B Bloomberg Aluminum Subindex Total Return ETN

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs RRRCX

35% FI Score
  • rrrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

DWS RREEF Real Estate Securities Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs RVVHX

35% FI Score
  • rvvhx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Royce Small-Cap Value Fund Investment Class

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare LABCX vs SBTAX

35% FI Score
  • sbtax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Salient Tactical Plus Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo