Expense Ratio Rating
5 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
7 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
7 /10
$LABAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- tahyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Pioneer High Yield Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- phybx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Putnam High Yield Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- smsrx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Multi-Sector Bond Fund Class SDR
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- aibdx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
American Century International Bond Fund A Class
Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- labcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Loomis Sayles Strategic Alpha Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.73% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- femb
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
First Trust Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- frfax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PGIM Floating Rate Income Fund- Class A
Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- masax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
MainStay MacKay Unconstrained Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pshcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Pioneer Short Term Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »