Expense Ratio Rating
5 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
7 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
7 /10
$LABAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- ifrax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Voya Floating Rate Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ciocx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Columbia Corporate Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- smrsx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
ALPS/Smith Short Duration Bond Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dgccx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Delaware Corporate Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.57% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- apecx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Columbia High Yield Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- souax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
American Beacon Sound Point Floating Rate Income Fund A Class
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- clmcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Columbia Mortgage Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pplcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
DWS Short Duration Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- plcsx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Pacific Funds Short Duration Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »