Expense Ratio Rating
5 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
8 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
8 /10
$KLCAX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 8,019 US Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- fgcax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Federated Short-Intermediate Total Return Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.62% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pmlax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
PIMCO Municipal Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.82% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mfdx
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Large Blend
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF
Expenses: 0.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
- mfxax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Core Plus Fixed Income Portfolio Class A
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- flhy
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Franklin Liberty High Yield Corporate ETF
Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- evv
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Eaton Vance Limited Duration Income Fund
Expenses: 2.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- emf
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Emerging Markets
Templeton Emerging Markets Fund Inc.
Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
- egf
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
BlackRock Enhanced Government Fund Inc.
Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pmaix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Pioneer Multi-Asset Income Fund A
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- oglnx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Invesco Oppenheimer Global Fund Class R
Expenses: 1.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- dbl
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Doubleline Opportunistic Credit Fund
Expenses: 2.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- pgsix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Putnam Mortgage Securities Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- hdaw
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Large Value
Xtrackers MSCI All World ex US High Dividend Yield Hedged Equity ETF
Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »
- fbmpx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Communication Services
Fidelity® Select Communication Services Portfolio
Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Communication Services Sector Equity fund. See why »
- drnyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
BNY Mellon New York Tax Exempt Bond Fund, Inc.
Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pandx
- Mutual Fund
- Alternative
- Short
PIMCO Short Asset Investment Fund Class I-3
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »
- rnsix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
RiverNorth Doubleline Strategic Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- itttx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Hartford Multi-Asset Income and Growth Fund Class R5
Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »