Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
9 /10
$JVAAX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 8,043 US Stocks Large Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- abtfx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
AB High Income Municipal Portfolio Class C
Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- btbfx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Boston Trust Asset Management Fund
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- jjn
- ETF
- Commodities
- Focused
iPath Series B Bloomberg Nickel Subindex Total Return ETN
Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »
- epskx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
MainStay Epoch Global Equity Yield Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- pgtox
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PGIM Global Total Return Fund - Class R2
Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hyhg
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
ProShares High Yield—Interest Rate Hedged
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- phezx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- International
PGIM Global Total Return (USD Hedged) Fund- Class Z
Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a International Bond fund. See why »
- fca
- ETF
- International Stocks
- China Stock
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »
- gvsax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
AllianzGI Retirement 2025 Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »