• dcccx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Small Blend

Delaware Small Cap Core Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• omfs
• ETF
• US Stocks
• Small Blend

Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF

Expenses: 0.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• swscx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Small Blend

Schwab Small-Cap Equity Fund™

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• vsswx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Small Blend

JPMorgan Small Cap Core Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• arsix
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Small Blend

AMG River Road Small Cap Value Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• kscd
• ETF
• US Stocks
• Small Blend

KFA Small Cap Quality Dividend Index ETF

Expenses: 0.51% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• crisx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Small Blend

CRM Small Cap Value Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 0.91% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• smeax
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Small Blend

Invesco Small Cap Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• gsscx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Small Blend

Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• lscrx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Small Blend

Loomis Sayles Small Capital Value Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »