Expense Ratio Rating
6 /10
Expense Rating
2 /10
Market Score
7 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
7 /10
$ISHIX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- eaiix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Eaton Vance Global Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hldax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Hartford Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- lzgox
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Lazard Global Fixed Income Portfolio Open Shares
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- lweax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Western Asset Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- tuifx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Toews Unconstrained Income Fund
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ftiix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Federated Global Total Return Bond Fund Class A Shares
Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- atpcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Aquila Three Peaks High Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- atmcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PIMCO Strategic Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.67% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- nficx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Neuberger Berman Floating Rate Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »