Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$IMNAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- gggax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Gabelli Global Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- mvgcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
MFS Low Volatility Global Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- ralix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Lazard Real Assets and Pricing Opportunities Portfolio Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- hggix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Harbor Global Leaders Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- kgdax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
DWS Global Small Cap Fund - Class A
Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- ehgix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Eaton Vance Hexavest Global Equity Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- ahacx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
American Beacon AHL TargetRisk Fund C
Expenses: 2.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- caxix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Catalyst/MAP Global Equity Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- eweix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Wells Fargo Intrinsic World Equity Fund - Class Admin
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »