ICMCX : Intrepid Disciplined Value Fund Investor Class

ICMCX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Value with HIGH fees.

ICMCX

Intrepid Disciplined Value Fund Investor Class

FI Score

16 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

3 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

1 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

1 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,182 US Stocks Mid-Cap Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare ICMCX vs GMCIX

31% FI Score
  • gmcix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

LMCG Global MultiCap Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ICMCX vs GSFCX

31% FI Score
  • gsfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Goldman Sachs Bond Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 1.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ICMCX vs HMANX

31% FI Score
  • hmanx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Horizon Multi-Asset Income Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ICMCX vs HRACX

31% FI Score
  • hracx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Hartford Growth Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare ICMCX vs IHYAX

31% FI Score
  • ihyax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Voya High Yield Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ICMCX vs IIGCX

31% FI Score
  • iigcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

VanEck International Investors Gold Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ICMCX vs PLCSX

31% FI Score
  • plcsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Pacific Funds Short Duration Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ICMCX vs KMED

31% FI Score
  • kmed
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

KraneShares Emerging Markets Healthcare Index ETF

Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ICMCX vs LCNIX

31% FI Score
  • lcnix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Lazard International Equity Concentrated Portfolio Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ICMCX vs PNVAX

31% FI Score
  • pnvax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Putnam International Capital Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ICMCX vs TEMMX

31% FI Score
  • temmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Templeton Emerging Markets Small Cap Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ICMCX vs RFEM

31% FI Score
  • rfem
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

First Trust RiverFront Dynamic Emerging Markets ETF

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare ICMCX vs RIOCX

31% FI Score
  • riocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Columbia Income Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ICMCX vs RMBKX

31% FI Score
  • rmbkx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare ICMCX vs SEBFX

31% FI Score
  • sebfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Saturna Sustainable Bond Fund

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare ICMCX vs SEFIX

31% FI Score
  • sefix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • International

SEI Institutional International Trust International Fixed Income Fund Class F

Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a International Bond fund. See why »

Compare ICMCX vs SEMIX

31% FI Score
  • semix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

Semper Short Duration Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare ICMCX vs SINBX

31% FI Score
  • sinbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Federated Strategic Income Fund Class B Shares

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ICMCX vs SINCX

31% FI Score
  • sincx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Federated Strategic Income Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 1.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare ICMCX vs SIRAX

31% FI Score
  • sirax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Sierra Tactical All Asset Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo