Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$ICLLX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 748 Allocation All-In-One funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- gdma
- ETF
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF New
Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- cbprx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund Class R
Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- mbeax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
AMG GW&K Global Allocation Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- wmbfx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Wells Fargo WealthBuilder Moderate Balanced Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- calcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Calvert Conservative Allocation Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- agiax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
AB Tax-Managed All Market Income Portfolio Class A
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- mbnbx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
MainStay Balanced Fund Class B
Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- caacx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Calvert Growth Allocation Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- cmalx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Crawford Multi-Asset Income Fund
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- hwacx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Hotchkis & Wiley Value Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- mbacx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
MainStay Balanced Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- pocex
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Aggressive-Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- eceax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Equity Asset Allocation Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- ioezx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
ICON Equity Income Fund Class S
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- wfmax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Wells Fargo Moderate Balanced Fund - Class A
Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- etnmx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Eventide Multi-Asset Income Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- pbcfx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
PGIM Income Builder Fund-Class B
Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- pccfx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
PGIM Income Builder Fund-Class C
Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- etamx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Eventide Multi-Asset Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »