Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$IATAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 643 US Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- acslx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
American Century Select Fund C Class
Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- ectgx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Growth 1.1 Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- klgax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
MainStay MacKay Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- ptwax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
PGIM Jennison 20/20 Focus Fund- Class A
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- sdgcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
DWS Capital Growth Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- dwocx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
BNY Mellon Research Growth Fund, Inc. Class C
Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- jcicx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
JPMorgan Intrepid Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- dlqax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
BNY Mellon Large Cap Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- jpecx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
JPMorgan Tax Aware Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »