IASMX : Guinness Atkinson Asia Focus Fund

IASMX is a International Stocks Market Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock with HIGH fees.

IASMX

Guinness Atkinson Asia Focus Fund

FI Score

16 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

2 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

2 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare IASMX vs RYZAX

15% FI Score
  • ryzax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Rydex S&P 500 Pure Value Fund Class H

Expenses: 1.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare IASMX vs HDSVX

15% FI Score
  • hdsvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Hodges Small Intrinsic Value Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare IASMX vs NMINX

15% FI Score
  • nminx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Columbia Maryland Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare IASMX vs DWAFX

14% FI Score
  • dwafx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Arrow DWA Balanced Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare IASMX vs TAAGX

14% FI Score
  • taagx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Timothy Aggressive Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare IASMX vs EPIBX

14% FI Score
  • epibx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

EuroPac International Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare IASMX vs NEAGX

14% FI Score
  • neagx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Needham Aggressive Growth Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare IASMX vs EAREX

14% FI Score
  • earex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Eaton Vance Real Estate Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare IASMX vs MISEX

14% FI Score
  • misex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Midas Magic

Expenses: 3.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare IASMX vs EFCNX

14% FI Score
  • efcnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Emerald Insights Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare IASMX vs NERCX

14% FI Score
  • nercx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Neuberger Berman Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare IASMX vs NGINX

14% FI Score
  • nginx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Columbia Georgia Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare IASMX vs EIM

14% FI Score
  • eim
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Eaton Vance Municipal Bond Fund

Expenses: 2.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare IASMX vs FLRQX

14% FI Score
  • flrqx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Franklin LifeSmart™ 2020 Retirement Target Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare IASMX vs KOIN

14% FI Score
  • koin
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Innovation Shares NextGen Protocol ETF

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare IASMX vs NEHCX

14% FI Score
  • nehcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Loomis Sayles High Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare IASMX vs CPQAX

14% FI Score
  • cpqax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Counterpoint Long-Short Equity Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare IASMX vs AYBCX

14% FI Score
  • aybcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

AllianzGI High Yield Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare IASMX vs ARLSX

14% FI Score
  • arlsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

AMG River Road Long-Short Fund Class N

Expenses: 2.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare IASMX vs NUGCX

14% FI Score
  • nugcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Nuveen Santa Barbara Global Dividend Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo