Expense Ratio Rating
8 /10
Expense Rating
4 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
4 /10
$IASBX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- tgmbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PGIM Corporate Bond Fund- Class Z
Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- itacx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Transamerica Short-Term Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mzhix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Muzinich U.S. High Yield Corporate Bond Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ecblx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Eaton Vance Floating - Rate Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fam
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
First Trust/Aberdeen Global Opportunity Income Fund
Expenses: 2.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- jsd
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Nuveen Short Duration Credit Opportunity Fund
Expenses: 3.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- plhix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Pacific Funds High Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- aft
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Apollo Senior Floating Rate Fund
Expenses: 4.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pbtrx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PGIM Global Total Return Fund - Class B
Expenses: 1.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »