Expense Ratio Rating
7 /10
Expense Rating
1 /10
Market Score
5 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
5 /10
$HRLYX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- pqicx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
PIMCO Dividend and Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- rlgcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
RiverFront Asset Allocation Growth & Income Class C
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- imnax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Transamerica Global Equity Class A
Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- hrlcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
The Hartford Global Real Asset Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- gdmox
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Lazard Global Dynamic Multi-Asset Portfolio Open Shares
Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- nqgcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Nuveen NWQ Global Equity Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- lpfax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- lperx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund Class R
Expenses: 1.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- raylx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Conductor Global Equity Value Fund Class Y
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »