HLMNX : Harding Loevner International Equity Portfolio Investor Class

HLMNX is a International Stocks Market Large Growth with HIGH fees.

HLMNX

Harding Loevner International Equity Portfolio Investor Class

FI Score

57 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

5 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

10 /10

Category Score

8 /10

Market Size

10 /10

Different Funds

We found 9,394 International Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare HLMNX vs PFIAX

47% FI Score
  • pfiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PIMCO Low Duration Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HLMNX vs STSCX

47% FI Score
  • stscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Sterling Capital Stratton Small Cap Value Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HLMNX vs STOT

47% FI Score
  • stot
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

SPDR DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HLMNX vs FCMVX

47% FI Score
  • fcmvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Fidelity® Mid Cap Value K6 Fund

Expenses: 0.44% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HLMNX vs TAAAX

47% FI Score
  • taaax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Thrivent Aggressive Allocation Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HLMNX vs JRBFX

47% FI Score
  • jrbfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

John Hancock Regional Bank Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare HLMNX vs NAWGX

47% FI Score
  • nawgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Voya Global High Dividend Low Volatility Fund A

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HLMNX vs NBMTX

47% FI Score
  • nbmtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund Trust Class

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HLMNX vs NEARX

47% FI Score
  • nearx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

U.S. Global Investors Near-Term Tax Free Fund

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HLMNX vs GQRIX

47% FI Score
  • gqrix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HLMNX vs NSTRX

47% FI Score
  • nstrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Columbia Short Term Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HLMNX vs OAKGX

47% FI Score
  • oakgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Oakmark Global Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HLMNX vs UMNIX

47% FI Score
  • umnix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Lazard US Short Duration Fixed Income Portfolio Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HLMNX vs OPER

47% FI Score
  • oper
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Short

ClearShares Ultra-Short Maturity ETF

Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare HLMNX vs OSINX

47% FI Score
  • osinx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Strategic Income Class R

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare HLMNX vs PAEAX

47% FI Score
  • paeax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HLMNX vs OGGCX

47% FI Score
  • oggcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

JPMorgan Investor Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HLMNX vs OBBCX

47% FI Score
  • obbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

JPMorgan Mortgage Backed Securities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare HLMNX vs MHCAX

47% FI Score
  • mhcax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

MainStay MacKay High Yield Corporate Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HLMNX vs MIMYX

47% FI Score
  • mimyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Loomis Sayles Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo