Expense Ratio Rating
2 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$HLFNX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 10,815 Sector Equity Financial Services funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- pccgx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Value
Pioneer Mid Cap Value Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- awpcx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Growth
AB Sustainable International Thematic Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »
- msllx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Blend
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Active International Allocation Portfolio Class L
Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
- mevox
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Lazard Managed Equity Volatility Portfolio Open Shares
Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- rdlcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Columbia Disciplined Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- eclcx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Eaton Vance Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- ecfhx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Eaton Vance Floating-Rate & High Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- vvocx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Value
Invesco Value Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- vicax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
USA Mutuals Vitium Global Fund Class A Shares
Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- csmdx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
Copeland SMID Cap Dividend Growth Fund Class I Shares
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- vicex
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
USA Mutuals Vitium Global Fund Investor Class Shares
Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- dainx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Blend
Dunham International Stock Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
- mgxcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
MainStay Growth Allocation Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- hnddx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Horizon Active Dividend Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- bcgax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Sterling Capital Diversified Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- dmcrx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
Driehaus Micro Cap Growth Fund
Expenses: 1.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- usbnx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Value
Pear Tree Polaris Small Cap Fund Ordinary Class
Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- miocx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
MFS Strategic Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »