• abtfx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• Municipal Bond

AB High Income Municipal Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

• btbfx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• All-In-One

Boston Trust Asset Management Fund

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

• jjn
• ETF
• Commodities
• Focused

iPath Series B Bloomberg Nickel Subindex Total Return ETN

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

• epskx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

MainStay Epoch Global Equity Yield Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

• pgtox
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

PGIM Global Total Return Fund - Class R2

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• hyhg
• ETF
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

ProShares High Yield—Interest Rate Hedged

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• kdfi
• ETF
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

KFA Dynamic Fixed Income ETF

Expenses: 0.46% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• phezx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• International

PGIM Global Total Return (USD Hedged) Fund- Class Z

Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a International Bond fund. See why »

• fca
• ETF
• International Stocks
• China Stock

First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

• gvsax
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Target-Date

AllianzGI Retirement 2025 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »