Expense Ratio Rating
5 /10
Expense Rating
2 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$HAVGX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- eittx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Parametric TABS 10-to-20 Year Laddered Municipal Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pdczx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
PGIM Income Builder Fund-Class Z
Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- eos
- Mutual Fund
- Other
- Options-based
Eaton Vance Enhanced Equity Income Fund II
Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Options-based Other fund. See why »
- epi
- ETF
- International Stocks
- India Stock
WisdomTree India Earnings Fund
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a India Stock International Stocks fund. See why »
- esgf
- ETF
- Allocation
- Total World
Invesco Global ESG Revenue ETF
Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- esgw
- ETF
- Allocation
- Total World
Columbia Sustainable Global Equity Income ETF
Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- hgxvx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Hartford Global Impact Fund Class R6
Expenses: 0.63% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- fcal
- ETF
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
First Trust California Municipal High Income ETF
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fcitx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Franklin Federal Intermediate-Term Tax-Free Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »