HAP : VanEck Vectors Natural Resources ETF

HAP is a Sector Equity Market Basic Materials with MODERATE fees.

HAP

VanEck Vectors Natural Resources ETF

FI Score

38 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

5 /10

Market Score

2 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

2 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,815 Sector Equity Basic Materials funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare HAP vs LTUIX

44% FI Score
  • ltuix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.62% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs FPXI

44% FI Score
  • fpxi
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs PRJCX

44% FI Score
  • prjcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

PGIM Jennison Global Opportunities Fund-Class C

Expenses: 1.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs MSOPX

44% FI Score
  • msopx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Opportunity Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs KCLIX

44% FI Score
  • kclix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Knights of Columbus Limited Duration Fund I Shares

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs PSHAX

44% FI Score
  • pshax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

PIMCO Short-Term Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs ATFCX

44% FI Score
  • atfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Invesco Limited Term Municipal Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs SGIDX

44% FI Score
  • sgidx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Crossmark Steward Global Equity Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs MEDAX

44% FI Score
  • medax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

MFS Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs CLMPX

44% FI Score
  • clmpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Columbia Strategic California Municipal Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs KGGAX

44% FI Score
  • kggax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Kopernik Global All-Cap Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs GER

44% FI Score
  • ger
  • Mutual Fund
  • Other
  • Master Limited Partnership

Goldman Sachs MLP and Energy Renaissance Fund

Expenses: 3.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Master Limited Partnership Other fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs SHYAX

44% FI Score
  • shyax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

SEI Institutional Managed Trust High Yield Bond Fund Class F

Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs HJPX

44% FI Score
  • hjpx
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Japan Stock

iShares Currency Hedged JPX-Nikkei 400 ETF

Expenses: 0.48% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs PSRCX

44% FI Score
  • psrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Pioneer Strategic Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs URTDX

44% FI Score
  • urtdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

JPMorgan Realty Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs MCSMX

44% FI Score
  • mcsmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Matthews China Small Companies Fund

Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs CWFIX

44% FI Score
  • cwfix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Chartwell Short Duration High Yield Fund

Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs HRLYX

44% FI Score
  • hrlyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Hartford Global Real Asset Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs SFRAX

44% FI Score
  • sfrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Virtus Seix Floating Rate High Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo