HAP : VanEck Vectors Natural Resources ETF

HAP is a Sector Equity Market Basic Materials with MODERATE fees.

HAP

VanEck Vectors Natural Resources ETF

FI Score

38 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

5 /10

Market Score

2 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

2 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,815 Sector Equity Basic Materials funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare HAP vs HMVTX

44% FI Score
  • hmvtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Hartford MidCap Value Fund Class R5

Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs CLMPX

44% FI Score
  • clmpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Columbia Strategic California Municipal Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs MTLBX

44% FI Score
  • mtlbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

MFS Municipal Limited Maturity Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs SEACX

44% FI Score
  • seacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs GOF

44% FI Score
  • gof
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs SHYAX

44% FI Score
  • shyax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

SEI Institutional Managed Trust High Yield Bond Fund Class F

Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs LGMCX

44% FI Score
  • lgmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Loomis Sayles Global Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs SRMAX

44% FI Score
  • srmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

DWS Short Term Municipal Bond Fund - Class A

Expenses: 0.72% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs GER

44% FI Score
  • ger
  • Mutual Fund
  • Other
  • Master Limited Partnership

Goldman Sachs MLP and Energy Renaissance Fund

Expenses: 3.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Master Limited Partnership Other fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs HJPX

44% FI Score
  • hjpx
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Japan Stock

iShares Currency Hedged JPX-Nikkei 400 ETF

Expenses: 0.48% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs LBHYX

44% FI Score
  • lbhyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Thrivent High Yield Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs FMPSX

44% FI Score
  • fmpsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Frontier MFG Global Plus Fund Service Class

Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs JTA

44% FI Score
  • jta
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Nuveen Tax-Advantaged Total Return Strategy Fund

Expenses: 2.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs PRJCX

44% FI Score
  • prjcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

PGIM Jennison Global Opportunities Fund-Class C

Expenses: 1.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs CEY

44% FI Score
  • cey
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

VictoryShares Emerging Market High Div Volatility Wtd ETF

Expenses: 0.51% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs HILSX

44% FI Score
  • hilsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Hartford International Value Fund Class R4

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs PFOCX

44% FI Score
  • pfocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • International

PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class C

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a International Bond fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs URTDX

44% FI Score
  • urtdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

JPMorgan Realty Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs BAPBX

44% FI Score
  • bapbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Smart Beta Retirement Fund Investor A Shares

Expenses: 0.32% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs PTHAX

44% FI Score
  • pthax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Putnam Tax-Free High Yield Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo