HAP : VanEck Vectors Natural Resources ETF

HAP is a Sector Equity Market Basic Materials with MODERATE fees.

HAP

VanEck Vectors Natural Resources ETF

FI Score

38 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

5 /10

Market Score

2 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

2 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,815 Sector Equity Basic Materials funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare HAP vs HQBTX

48% FI Score
  • hqbtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Hartford Quality Bond Fund Class R5

Expenses: 0.56% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs FHARX

48% FI Score
  • fharx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Fidelity Freedom® Blend 2040 Fund

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs NUMV

48% FI Score
  • numv
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs IUSS

48% FI Score
  • iuss
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Invesco RAFI Strategic US Small Company ETF

Expenses: 0.23% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs LTXCX

48% FI Score
  • ltxcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

American Funds Limited Term Tax Exempt Bond Fund® Class C

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs HLMGX

48% FI Score
  • hlmgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Harding Loevner Global Equity Portfolio Advisor Class

Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs USNYX

48% FI Score
  • usnyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

USAA New York Bond Fund

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs SDOW

48% FI Score
  • sdow
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs NYVCX

48% FI Score
  • nyvcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Davis New York Venture Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs HIPIX

48% FI Score
  • hipix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Hartford Inflation Plus Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs PEQCX

48% FI Score
  • peqcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Putnam Equity Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs ISIAX

48% FI Score
  • isiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Voya Strategic Income Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs HIPTX

48% FI Score
  • hiptx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Hartford Inflation Plus Fund Class R5

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs MACVX

48% FI Score
  • macvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

MFS Conservative Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs ISCF

48% FI Score
  • iscf
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor Intl Small-Cap ETF

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs LTNYX

48% FI Score
  • ltnyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Rochester Limited Term New York Municipal Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs PEQNX

48% FI Score
  • peqnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Putnam Equity Income Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs JLKLX

48% FI Score
  • jlklx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

John Hancock Funds Multimanager 2055 Lifetime Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 0.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs EWJV

48% FI Score
  • ewjv
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Japan Stock

iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF

Expenses: 0.15% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs HFDYX

48% FI Score
  • hfdyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opportunities Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo