GTSGX : Madison Mid Cap Fund Class Y

GTSGX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Blend with MODERATE fees.

GTSGX

Madison Mid Cap Fund Class Y

FI Score

45 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

6 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

6 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,161 US Stocks Mid-Cap Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare GTSGX vs OGBCX

49% FI Score
  • ogbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

JPMorgan Investor Balanced Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GTSGX vs OGINX

49% FI Score
  • oginx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Opportunities Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GTSGX vs PABAX

49% FI Score
  • pabax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Balanced Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GTSGX vs USCRX

49% FI Score
  • uscrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

USAA Cornerstone Moderately Aggressive Fund

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GTSGX vs OCGCX

49% FI Score
  • ocgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

JPMorgan Investor Conservative Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GTSGX vs OPSIX

49% FI Score
  • opsix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Strategic Income Class A

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare GTSGX vs ABRZX

49% FI Score
  • abrzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Balanced-Risk Allocation Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GTSGX vs ANGLX

49% FI Score
  • anglx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Angel Oak Multi-Strategy Income Fund A Shares

Expenses: 1.36% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare GTSGX vs ASLAX

49% FI Score
  • aslax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

AB Select US Long/Short Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare GTSGX vs AUGAX

49% FI Score
  • augax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Columbia Quality Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare GTSGX vs BALCX

49% FI Score
  • balcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

American Funds American Balanced Fund® Class C

Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GTSGX vs OSMNX

49% FI Score
  • osmnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Invesco Oppenheimer International Small-Mid Company Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.57% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GTSGX vs BBNTX

49% FI Score
  • bbntx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Sterling Capital North Carolina Intermediate Tax-Free Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GTSGX vs BBSGX

49% FI Score
  • bbsgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Sterling Capital Short Duration Bond Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.43% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GTSGX vs JCLGX

49% FI Score
  • jclgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Growth Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GTSGX vs HIPYX

49% FI Score
  • hipyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Hartford Inflation Plus Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.58% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GTSGX vs HQBIX

49% FI Score
  • hqbix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Hartford Quality Bond Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.53% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare GTSGX vs BCPIX

49% FI Score
  • bcpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Brandes Core Plus Fixed Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare GTSGX vs ACCNX

49% FI Score
  • accnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

American Century Core Plus Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare GTSGX vs FSEAX

49% FI Score
  • fseax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Fidelity® Emerging Asia Fund

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo