GSPAX : Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund Class A

GSPAX is a US Stocks Market Large Blend with HIGH fees.

GSPAX

Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund Class A

FI Score

47 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

3 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

10 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare GSPAX vs EICOX

29% FI Score
  • eicox
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Eaton Vance Emerging and Frontier Countries Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GSPAX vs HFZYX

29% FI Score
  • hfzyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Multi-Sector Bond Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GSPAX vs HIPRX

29% FI Score
  • hiprx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Hartford Inflation Plus Fund Class R3

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GSPAX vs IAGEX

29% FI Score
  • iagex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Voya Global Equity Dividend Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GSPAX vs PRNT

29% FI Score
  • prnt
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

The 3D Printing ETF

Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GSPAX vs PROTX

29% FI Score
  • protx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Probabilities Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare GSPAX vs MCKBX

29% FI Score
  • mckbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

MainStay Conservative Allocation Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GSPAX vs MELIX

29% FI Score
  • melix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Emerging Markets Leaders Portfolio Class I

Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GSPAX vs ITEQ

29% FI Score
  • iteq
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

BlueStar Israel Technology ETF

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GSPAX vs MGGYX

29% FI Score
  • mggyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Mirova Global Green Bond Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GSPAX vs IIRFX

29% FI Score
  • iirfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Other Region

Voya Russia Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Region International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GSPAX vs TLDAX

29% FI Score
  • tldax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Thornburg Low Duration Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GSPAX vs GTADX

29% FI Score
  • gtadx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Goldman Sachs Target Date 2025 Portfolio A Shares

Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GSPAX vs SBB

29% FI Score
  • sbb
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares Short SmallCap600

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare GSPAX vs NCEAX

29% FI Score
  • nceax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Neuberger Berman Greater China Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GSPAX vs FSGIX

29% FI Score
  • fsgix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Federated U.S. Government Securities Fund 1-3 Years Service Shares

Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GSPAX vs NIMAX

29% FI Score
  • nimax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Neuberger Berman Municipal Impact Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GSPAX vs DLHAX

29% FI Score
  • dlhax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Delaware Healthcare Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GSPAX vs NMDMX

29% FI Score
  • nmdmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Columbia Maryland Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GSPAX vs NMHAX

29% FI Score
  • nmhax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Neuberger Berman Municipal High Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo