GRRSX : James Alpha Macro Portfolio Class S Shares

GRRSX is a Alternatives Market Future with LOW fees.

GRRSX

James Alpha Macro Portfolio Class S Shares

FI Score

25 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

9 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

1 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

1 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,115 Alternatives Future funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare GRRSX vs RYRUX

21% FI Score
  • ryrux
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Rydex Russell 2000 2x Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare GRRSX vs CHNCX

21% FI Score
  • chncx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Clough China Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GRRSX vs OFSAX

21% FI Score
  • ofsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Olstein Strategic Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GRRSX vs BFSAX

21% FI Score
  • bfsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

BFS Equity Fund

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GRRSX vs NCBVX

21% FI Score
  • ncbvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

PGIM QMA Mid-Cap Value Fund- Class C

Expenses: 1.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GRRSX vs PFICX

21% FI Score
  • pficx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GRRSX vs TGRCX

21% FI Score
  • tgrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Invesco Pacific Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GRRSX vs ICPUX

21% FI Score
  • icpux
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Integrity Mid-North American Resources Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GRRSX vs SMDPX

21% FI Score
  • smdpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Sterling Capital SMID Opportunities Fund A Shares

Expenses: 1.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GRRSX vs BDCS

21% FI Score
  • bdcs
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Utilities

UBS ETRACS Linked to the Wells Fargo Business Development Company Index ETN

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GRRSX vs GITCX

21% FI Score
  • gitcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GRRSX vs OEMNX

21% FI Score
  • oemnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GRRSX vs SGACX

21% FI Score
  • sgacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Virtus SGA Global Growth C Class

Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GRRSX vs SVUBX

20% FI Score
  • svubx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

PGIM QMA Mid-Cap Value Fund- Class B

Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GRRSX vs AAIIX

20% FI Score
  • aaiix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Ancora Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare GRRSX vs PPTAX

20% FI Score
  • pptax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Virtus KAR Global Quality Dividend Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GRRSX vs EEIDX

20% FI Score
  • eeidx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GRRSX vs BHCHX

20% FI Score
  • bhchx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Baron Health Care Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GRRSX vs BGRWX

20% FI Score
  • bgrwx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Barrett Growth Fund

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GRRSX vs DPRCX

20% FI Score
  • dprcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Delaware Global Listed Real Assets Fund C Class

Expenses: 2.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo