Expense Ratio Rating
0 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$GPNCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 266 Bond Government Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- pbtp
- ETF
- Bond
- Government Bond
Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF
Expenses: 0.07% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- shtix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
Invesco Short Duration Inflation Protected Fund Class A2
Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pripx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
T. Rowe Price Inflation Protected Bond Fund
Expenses: 0.41% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- gtip
- ETF
- Bond
- Government Bond
Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.12% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ffxsx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
Fidelity® Limited Term Government Fund
Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mbsd
- ETF
- Bond
- Government Bond
FlexShares Disciplined Duration MBS Index Fund
Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ealdx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
Eaton Vance Short Duration Government Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fkfsx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
Franklin U.S. Government Securities Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- tipz
- ETF
- Bond
- Government Bond
PIMCO Broad U.S. TIPS Index Exchange-Traded Fund
Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »