GPAPX : Goldman Sachs Short-Term Conservative Income Fund Class A

GPAPX is a Alternative Market Short with HIGH fees.

GPAPX

Goldman Sachs Short-Term Conservative Income Fund Class A

FI Score

52 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

4 /10

Expense Rating

5 /10

Market Score

8 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

8 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,034 Alternative Short funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare GPAPX vs GLNBX

16% FI Score
  • glnbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MFS Global New Discovery Fund Class B

Expenses: 2.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GPAPX vs GLNCX

16% FI Score
  • glncx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MFS Global New Discovery Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GPAPX vs HPECX

16% FI Score
  • hpecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Highland Socially Responsible Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GPAPX vs GRECX

16% FI Score
  • grecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Goldman Sachs Real Estate Securities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare GPAPX vs GWSVX

16% FI Score
  • gwsvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Gabelli Focus Five Fund Class AAA

Expenses: 1.64% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GPAPX vs IASMX

16% FI Score
  • iasmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Guinness Atkinson Asia Focus Fund

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GPAPX vs ICMCX

16% FI Score
  • icmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Intrepid Disciplined Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GPAPX vs IDVIX

16% FI Score
  • idvix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Copeland International Risk Managed Dividend Growth Fund Class I Shares

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GPAPX vs PJDCX

16% FI Score
  • pjdcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

PGIM Jennison Rising Dividend Fund- Class C

Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GPAPX vs IMSCX

16% FI Score
  • imscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

IMS Capital Value Fund

Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GPAPX vs INTLX

16% FI Score
  • intlx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Forester Discovery Fund

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GPAPX vs JMNSX

16% FI Score
  • jmnsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

JPMorgan Research Market Neutral Fund Class I

Expenses: 3.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare GPAPX vs WAFMX

16% FI Score
  • wafmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Wasatch Frontier Emerging Small Countries Fund Investor Class Shares

Expenses: 2.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GPAPX vs REIAX

16% FI Score
  • reiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

West Loop Realty Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare GPAPX vs RESIX

16% FI Score
  • resix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

RBC Emerging Markets Small Cap Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GPAPX vs RYCPX

16% FI Score
  • rycpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Defensive

Rydex Consumer Products Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Defensive Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GPAPX vs RYINX

16% FI Score
  • ryinx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Communication Services

Rydex Internet Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Communication Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GPAPX vs SDVCX

16% FI Score
  • sdvcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

AIG Select Dividend Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GPAPX vs SIETX

16% FI Score
  • sietx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

AIG International Dividend Strategy Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GPAPX vs TIAGX

16% FI Score
  • tiagx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Timothy Plan Aggressive Growth Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo