Diversification Rating
4 /10
Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
4 /10
Market Score
1 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
1 /10
$GOAT Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- jvgix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Janus Henderson Adaptive Global Allocation Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- mktrx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
MainStay Income Builder Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- mctrx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
MainStay Income Builder Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- glvax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Invesco Oppenheimer Global Focus Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- dglcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
BNY Mellon Global Stock Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- jobix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
JOHCM Global Income Builder Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- atwcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
AB Tax-Managed Wealth Appreciation Strategy Class C
Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- fihd
- ETF
- Allocation
- Total World
UBS AG FI Enhanced Global High Yield ETN
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- qgrcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Invesco Oppenheimer Global Allocation Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »