Expense Ratio Rating
8 /10
Expense Rating
2 /10
Market Score
0 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
0 /10
$GMCIX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- mwocx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
MFS Global Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- bglbx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
BMO Global Low Volatility Equity Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- aglcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
American Century Focused Global Growth Fund C Class
Expenses: 2.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- ekgax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Wells Fargo Global Small Cap Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- fgilx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Fidelity® Global Equity Income Fund
Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- deqcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
BNY Mellon Global Equity Income Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- hgxax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Hartford Global Impact Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- sgapx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Virtus SGA Global Growth I Class
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- mwobx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
MFS Global Growth Fund Class B
Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »