Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$GLVCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- evgbc
- ETF
- Allocation
- Total World
Eaton Vance Global Income Builder NextShares
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- teqcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Touchstone Global ESG Equity Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- mgqix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Sustain Portfolio Class I
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- pgmax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
PIMCO Global Core Asset Allocation Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- mecdx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
MainStay Epoch Capital Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- ugeix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
USAA Global Equity Income Fund Fund Shares
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- wggnx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
William Blair Global Leaders Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- gprox
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Grandeur Peak Global Reach Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- dayfx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
AlphaSimplex Multi-Asset Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »