Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$GLVCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- palcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
AllianzGI Global Allocation Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- nwwox
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Virtus Vontobel Global Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- seefx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Saturna Sustainable Equity Fund
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- caeix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- erbcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein Equity Strategy Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- cetax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Centerstone Investors Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- evgbx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Evermore Global Value Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- clacx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
AdvisorOne CLS Global Aggressive Equity Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- wtmvx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Segall Bryant & Hamill Global Large Cap Fund Retail Class
Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »