Expense Ratio Rating
5 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
5 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
5 /10
$GLOSX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- hrlax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Hartford Global Real Asset Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- fmiex
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Wasatch Global Value Fund⢠Investor Class Shares
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- ecdix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Dividend Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- mcgcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc.Investor C Shares
Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- dvfax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Cohen & Steers Alternative Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- bglbx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
BMO Global Low Volatility Equity Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- arthx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Artisan Global Equity Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- gxscx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Goldman Sachs Satellite Strategies Portfolio Class C
Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- sgifx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Crossmark Steward Global Equity Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.64% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »