GLO : Clough Global Opportunities Fund

GLO is a Other Market Tactical Allocation with HIGH fees.

GLO

Clough Global Opportunities Fund

FI Score

37 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

0 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

10 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

10 /10

$GLO Alternatives

See More

Different Funds

We found 11,484 Other Tactical Allocation funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare GLO vs LUBIX

47% FI Score
  • lubix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Thrivent Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs LSGSX

47% FI Score
  • lsgsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Loomis Sayles Inflation Protected Securities Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs CPCFX

47% FI Score
  • cpcfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Invesco Core Plus Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs LIT

47% FI Score
  • lit
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Global X Lithium & Battery Tech ETF

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs SFIG

47% FI Score
  • sfig
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

WisdomTree U.S. Short-Term Corporate Bond Fund

Expenses: 0.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs GQRIX

47% FI Score
  • gqrix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

GQG Partners Global Quality Equity Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs URTY

47% FI Score
  • urty
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProShares UltraPro Russell2000

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs NEARX

47% FI Score
  • nearx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

U.S. Global Investors Near-Term Tax Free Fund

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs FEO

47% FI Score
  • feo
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

First Trust/Aberdeen Emerging Opportunity Fund

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs BEMIX

47% FI Score
  • bemix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Brandes Emerging Markets Value Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs EMGYX

47% FI Score
  • emgyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Wells Fargo Emerging Markets Equity Fund - Class Admin

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs ERH

47% FI Score
  • erh
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Wells Fargo Utilities and High Income Fund

Expenses: 1.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs OPER

47% FI Score
  • oper
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Short

ClearShares Ultra-Short Maturity ETF

Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs FESGX

47% FI Score
  • fesgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

First Eagle Global Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.86% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs NARAX

47% FI Score
  • narax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Virtus Newfleet Multi-Sector Short Term Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs NBMTX

47% FI Score
  • nbmtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Growth Fund Trust Class

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs USO

47% FI Score
  • uso
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

United States Oil Fund, LP

Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs NAWGX

47% FI Score
  • nawgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Voya Global High Dividend Low Volatility Fund A

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs MHCAX

47% FI Score
  • mhcax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

MainStay MacKay High Yield Corporate Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs FEP

47% FI Score
  • fep
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

First Trust Europe AlphaDEX Fund

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo