• hjpx
• ETF
• International Stocks
• Japan Stock

iShares Currency Hedged JPX-Nikkei 400 ETF

Expenses: 0.48% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

• hmvtx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Mid-Cap Value

Hartford MidCap Value Fund Class R5

Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

• flrmx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Target-Date

Franklin LifeSmart™ 2020 Retirement Target Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

• hrlyx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

Hartford Global Real Asset Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

• fmpsx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Growth

Frontier MFG Global Plus Fund Service Class

Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

• twm
• ETF
• Alternative
• Inverse

ProShares UltraShort Russell2000

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

• htd
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• All-In-One

John Hancock Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund

Expenses: 2.61% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

• hylv
• ETF
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

IQ S&P High Yield Low Volatility Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• iatax
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Growth

Ivy Accumulative Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

• ibd
• ETF
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Inspire Corporate Bond Impact ETF

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »