GGCIX : Gabelli Growth Fund Class I

GGCIX is a US Stocks Market Large Growth with HIGH fees.

GGCIX

Gabelli Growth Fund Class I

FI Score

39 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

4 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

5 /10

Category Score

8 /10

Market Size

5 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,019 US Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare GGCIX vs BATT

22% FI Score
  • batt
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Amplify Advanced Battery Metals and Materials ETF

Expenses: 0.72% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GGCIX vs GREAX

22% FI Score
  • greax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Goldman Sachs Real Estate Securities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare GGCIX vs KARS

22% FI Score
  • kars
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Cyclicals

KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclicals Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GGCIX vs MDGRX

22% FI Score
  • mdgrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

BlackRock Natural Resources Trust Investor A Shares

Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GGCIX vs EHGAX

22% FI Score
  • ehgax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Eaton Vance Hexavest Global Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GGCIX vs EPGFX

22% FI Score
  • epgfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

EuroPac Gold Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GGCIX vs EPVIX

22% FI Score
  • epvix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

EuroPac International Value Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GGCIX vs LZSMX

22% FI Score
  • lzsmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Lazard International Small Cap Equity Portfolio Open Shares

Expenses: 1.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GGCIX vs LVLAX

22% FI Score
  • lvlax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Invesco Low Volatility Emerging Markets Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GGCIX vs AFLEX

22% FI Score
  • aflex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Anfield Universal Fixed Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GGCIX vs RAANX

22% FI Score
  • raanx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Altegris/AACA Opportunistic Real Estate Fund N

Expenses: 2.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare GGCIX vs RRGCX

22% FI Score
  • rrgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

DWS RREEF Global Real Estate Securities Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GGCIX vs MILAX

22% FI Score
  • milax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Mirae Asset Asia Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GGCIX vs RGNCX

22% FI Score
  • rgncx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Victory Global Natural Resources Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GGCIX vs GTNDX

22% FI Score
  • gtndx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Global Low Volatility Equity Yield Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GGCIX vs KSMUX

22% FI Score
  • ksmux
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Kansas Municipal Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GGCIX vs JOLIX

22% FI Score
  • jolix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Janus Henderson Emerging Markets Managed Volatility Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GGCIX vs NITCX

22% FI Score
  • nitcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Aquila Narragansett Tax-Free Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GGCIX vs IGNAX

22% FI Score
  • ignax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Ivy Natural Resources Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GGCIX vs OEMAX

22% FI Score
  • oemax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo