Expense Ratio Rating
7 /10
Expense Rating
3 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
4 /10
$GCC Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 11,417 Commodities Broad funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- spyg
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
Expenses: 0.04% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- vym
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Vanguard High Dividend Yield Index Fund ETF Shares
Expenses: 0.06% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- shm
- ETF
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
SPDR Nuveen Bloomberg Barclays Short Term Municipal Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- vb
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund ETF Shares
Expenses: 0.05% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- vbr
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Small Value
Vanguard Small-Cap Value Index Fund ETF Shares
Expenses: 0.07% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- vfiix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
Vanguard GNMA Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 0.21% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- vipsx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
Vanguard Inflation-Protected Securities Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- vxf
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Blend
Vanguard Extended Market Index Fund ETF Shares
Expenses: 0.06% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- ffedx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
Fidelity Freedom® Index 2025 Fund Institutional Premium Class
Expenses: 0.08% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »