Expense Ratio Rating
6 /10
Expense Rating
3 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
3 /10
We found 8,623 Bond International funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
Global X MSCI China Health Care ETF
Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »
MFS Low Volatility Equity Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.64% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
Global X MSCI China Consumer Staples ETF
Expenses: 0.67% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »
Putnam Equity Spectrum Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
PIMCO RealPath Blend 2055 Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
AdvisorOne CLS Global Aggressive Equity Fund Class N
Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Discovery Portfolio Class L
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
Columbia Small Cap Value Fund I Class C
Expenses: 2.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »
PIMCO CommodityRealReturn Strategy Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2024 Adam Fortuna
Site Map