GBIL : Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF

GBIL is a Alternative Market Short with LOW fees.

GBIL

Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF

FI Score

72 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

10 /10

Expense Rating

9 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,034 Alternative Short funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare GBIL vs PDREX

22% FI Score
  • pdrex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Putnam Dynamic Risk Allocation Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs IGNAX

22% FI Score
  • ignax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Ivy Natural Resources Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs GURPX

22% FI Score
  • gurpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Guggenheim Risk Managed Real Estate Fund Class P

Expenses: 1.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs JTQAX

22% FI Score
  • jtqax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

John Hancock ESG International Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs MALTX

22% FI Score
  • maltx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Latin America Stock

BlackRock Latin America Fund, Inc. Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Latin America Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs GDGSX

22% FI Score
  • gdgsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Sit Global Dividend Growth Fund Class S

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs BATT

22% FI Score
  • batt
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Amplify Advanced Battery Metals and Materials ETF

Expenses: 0.72% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs MGTCX

22% FI Score
  • mgtcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Transamerica Mid Cap Growth C

Expenses: 1.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs CRECX

22% FI Score
  • crecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Columbia Real Estate Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs SEGPX

22% FI Score
  • segpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund Class P

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs NCIGX

22% FI Score
  • ncigx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Nuveen NWQ International Value Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs PIMEX

22% FI Score
  • pimex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Putnam Intermediate-Term Municipal Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs ECFVX

22% FI Score
  • ecfvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Eaton Vance Focused Value Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs IREAX

22% FI Score
  • ireax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Ivy LaSalle Global Real Estate Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs LOUP

22% FI Score
  • loup
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Innovator Loup Frontier Tech ETF

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs CGAVX

22% FI Score
  • cgavx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

Causeway Global Absolute Return Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs MILAX

22% FI Score
  • milax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Mirae Asset Asia Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs DSGDX

22% FI Score
  • dsgdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Delaware Small Cap Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs LTFCX

22% FI Score
  • ltfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Columbia Acorn Select Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs FLDGX

22% FI Score
  • fldgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Meeder Dynamic Allocation Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo