GBIL : Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF

GBIL is a Alternative Market Short with LOW fees.

GBIL

Goldman Sachs Access Treasury 0-1 Year ETF

FI Score

72 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

10 /10

Expense Rating

9 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 11,034 Alternative Short funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare GBIL vs HSMAX

29% FI Score
  • hsmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Hartford Small Cap Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs HUDIX

29% FI Score
  • hudix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Huber Capital Diversified Large Cap Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs ICWIX

29% FI Score
  • icwix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Integrity Mid-North American Resources Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs IDMIX

29% FI Score
  • idmix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

iM Dolan McEniry Corporate Bond Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs PJIAX

29% FI Score
  • pjiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

PGIM Jennison Focused Value Fund- Class A

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs JAQIX

29% FI Score
  • jaqix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Janus Henderson Asia Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs JIFIX

29% FI Score
  • jifix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

Janus Henderson International Value Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs JOAMX

29% FI Score
  • joamx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

JOHCM Asia Ex-Japan Equity Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs JPHCX

29% FI Score
  • jphcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

JPMorgan Floating Rate Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs KBWD

29% FI Score
  • kbwd
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Invesco KBW High Dividend Yield Financial ETF

Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs KCIIX

29% FI Score
  • kciix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Knights of Columbus International Equity Fund I Share

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs LGH

29% FI Score
  • lgh
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

HCM Defender 500 Index ETF

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs PRFBX

29% FI Score
  • prfbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Putnam Research Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs PRACX

29% FI Score
  • pracx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Putnam Research Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs PRICX

29% FI Score
  • pricx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

PGIM Government Income Fund- Class C

Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs PRVBX

29% FI Score
  • prvbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Permanent Portfolio Versatile Bond Portfolio Class I

Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs PSKCX

29% FI Score
  • pskcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs RDVIX

29% FI Score
  • rdvix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Royce Dividend Value Fund Investment Class

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs SBFAX

29% FI Score
  • sbfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

1919 Financial Services Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GBIL vs SCCPX

29% FI Score
  • sccpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Sterling Capital Corporate Fund Institutional shares

Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo